Introduction

In the past 20-30 years, cities around the world have increasingly taken an interest in expanding and promoting active mobility means and networks, such as providing dedicated or protected bike lanes, bike share programs, and active mobility networks (City of Toronto, n.d.). Bike Share Toronto is Toronto’s official docked bike-sharing system, sponsored by Tangerine Bank since 2011 (Bike Share Toronto, n.d.; El-Assi et al., 2017). Bike-sharing not only inherits the benefits of cycling but also provides additional incentives such as convenience and financial savings for its users (Fishman, 2016).

Despite these benefits, bike-sharing also faces challenges and barriers that may limit its accessibility and equity for diverse populations, especially due to its docked nature and the arising first and last-mile issues. With the golden exception of the Netherlands’ extensive biking infrastructure, many cities’ increasing interest in expanding active mobility networks has rarely extended beyond downtown districts (Annis, 2023; Fishman, 2016).

Bike-sharing has the potential to combat social exclusion by providing improved mobility options, but this requires careful operation and management. As such, ensuring equitable service provision is a critical consideration in the development and expansion of bike-sharing systems, to promote an inclusive and equitable society.

Research Questions
  1. How equitable is the access to Bike Share Toronto for all Toronto residents, especially for population subgroups based on gender, income or ethnicity?
  2. Which Bike Share Toronto service areas have higher or lower levels of equity, and where should the system expansion be prioritized to improve the service provision equity?
Data
We utilize four data sources in this project, as shown in the table below.
Name Description Format Source (URL) Accessed Time
Bikeshare Ridership Toronto bike-share trip data for the whole year 2023 CSV City of Toronto Open Data 2024-01-20
Bikeshare Stations Toronto bike-share station information JSON Toronto Parking Authority through GBFS 2024-01-08
Road Network OpenStreetMap road network data for Ontario, Canada PBF OpenStreetMap through Geofabrik 2024-01-08
2021 Census 2021 Canadian Census data sf data.frame Statistics Canada through cancensus package 2024-02-05
Workflow Diagram

To measure the coverage area of each bike share station, we calculated the 15-minute walking distance network buffers around them, using the r5r package in R (Pereira et al., 2021). To avoid overlapping in catchment areas, we created Voronoi polygons (Okabe et al., 2009) based on Euclidean distance for each station and intersected them with the network buffers to get the non-overlapping coverage areas for each bike share station. The interactive map below shows the non-overlapping catchment for each station.

To construct metrics quantifying the service provision equity, we calculated eight socio-demographic variables: the percentages of Females, Indigenous people, White people, Chinese people, Black people, Latino people, people with household total income below $40,000, and people with household total income above $100,000 in 2020 for each census dissemination area in the City of Toronto. We used the areal package in R (Prener & Revord, 2019) to reshape the census data into the non-overlapping coverage areas, using the areal weighted interpolation method.

Areal weighted interpolation involves four steps:

  1. Intersecting the non-overlapping coverage areas with the census dissemination areas.
  2. Calculating an areal weight for each intersected feature, using W_i=\frac{A_i}{\sum_i A_{ik}}.
  3. Estimating the share of the population value that occupies the intersected feature, using E_i=V_j\times W_i.
  4. Summarizing the data based on the target identification number, using G_k=\sum_i E_{ik}.

Then, the Toronto Bike Share system-wide socio-demographics were calculated as a weighted average based on ridership at each station, \overline{x}=\frac{\sum n\times x}{n}.

We applied the Multivariate Clustering Geoprocessing tool (K-means Clustering) in ArcGIS Pro to the eight socio-demographic variables of the bike share stations in order to group them into five clusters based on their attribute similarities. From these five clusters, we identified existing catchment areas that are relatively more equitable compared to others.

We used Hotspot Analysis or Getis-Ord Gi^* (Getis & Ord, 1992) to identify the census dissemination areas that have high or low values of the socio-demographic variables, compared to the surrounding areas. We employed a spatial weight matrix constructed using the 40-nearest neighbours method, along with the row standardized Bisquare Kernel Function, w_{ij}=[1-(\frac{d_{ij}}{\alpha_i})^2]^2 and \sum_j w_{ij}=1.

We identified socio-demographic hotspots with a confidence level exceeding 90% and converted them into raster format, with cell values equal to the original socio-demographic variables. We created an approximate 1-kilometre buffer zone raster around the equitable catchment areas identified by the cluster analysis. We computed a weighted sum of these layers to ascertain the most suitable areas for the expansion of the Bike Share Toronto system. The weights for the socio-demographic hotspot layers were set as the inverse of their respective means, w_i=\frac{1}{\mu_i}. The buffer layer was assigned a weight of 1.2 to balance the importance of proximity to existing stations against the need to serve underserved populations. For more details, you can access the maps for each raster layer and their corresponding weights through this link.

Discussion and Conclusion

We scrutinized the Bike Share Toronto system through the lens of equity. Employing catchment area analysis, we discovered disparities in service provision: an oversupply to White, Chinese, and low-income populations contrasted with an undersupply to Black and female demographics. These findings indicate significant opportunities for enhancing the system’s equitable distribution of services. Additionally, we performed a suitability analysis to pinpoint priority zones for potential network expansion, aiming to bolster equitable access across the city. The areas with the highest suitability scores include Scarborough’s West Hill, North York, Yorkdale, and predominantly the Jane and Finch area.

Our analysis is subject to two primary constraints:

  1. Due to the unavailability of historical data for bike share stations, our study is based on real-time station data accessed on January 8, 2024.

  2. The delineation of non-overlapping catchment areas was performed using Euclidean distance. While this method provides a general overview, it does not account for the actual travel distance along the road network.

For more details, you can access the poster, the slides and the report.

Black Residents (Weight=0.06)

Black Residents (Weight=0.06)

Chinese Residents (Weight=0.03)

Chinese Residents (Weight=0.03)

Female Residents (Weight=0.02)

Female Residents (Weight=0.02)

Indigenous Residents (Weight=0.55)

Indigenous Residents (Weight=0.55)

Latino Residents (Weight=0.13)

Latino Residents (Weight=0.13)

Low Income Residents (Weight=0.04)

Low Income Residents (Weight=0.04)

Buffer (\approx1km) around Existing Equitable Catchment Areas (Weight=1.2)

Buffer (\approx1km) around Existing Equitable Catchment Areas (Weight=1.2)
Notes:
  1. Socio-demographic layers are measured in percentages and the weights are the inverse of their specific mean values, w_i=\frac{1}{\mu_i}.
  2. The buffer layer is dummy coded (1 for fall inside the buffer and 0 otherwise).

Annis, R. (2023). What Cycling Eden Can Teach the World About Bicycle Infrastructure. Bicycling. https://www.bicycling.com/culture/a43907904/what-netherlands-can-teach-the-world-about-bicycle-infrastructure/

Bike Share Toronto. (n.d.). FAQ. https://bikesharetoronto.com/faq/

City of Toronto. (n.d.). ActiveTO. https://www.toronto.ca/explore-enjoy/recreation/activeto/

El-Assi, W., Salah Mahmoud, M., & Nurul Habib, K. (2017). Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation, 44, 589-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z

Fishman, E. (2016). Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036

Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical analysis, 24(3), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x

Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., & Chiu, S. N. (2009). Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. Wiley.

Pereira, R. H. M., Saraiva, M., Herszenhut, D., Braga, C. K. V., & Conway, M. W. (2021). r5r: Rapid Realistic Routing on Multimodal Transport Networks with R5 in R. Findings, 21262. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.21262

Prener, C. G., & Revord, C. K. (2019). areal: An R package for areal weighted interpolation. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(37), 1221. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0122

von Bergmann, J., Shkolnik, D., & Jacobs, A. (2021). cancensus: R package to access, retrieve, and work with Canadian Census data and geography. https://mountainmath.github.io/cancensus/